You say that “by pressing case study solution timber less, bats can be made much heavier whilst still keeping a mild feel and pickup”. As a physicist and cricketer I know that case study answer pickup of a bat relies upon only on its weight and case study solution distance down case study answer blade to its centre of percussion. The centre of percussion is close to case study answer centre of gravity which are located by balancing case study answer bat on a knife edge across its miraculous floor, but is not coincident with it as a result of swinging a bat is partly a rotational motion. So: how can a lower wood density, which suggests a thicker bat for case study solution same weight since case study answer width is fixed and case study solution length varies little improve case study answer pickup?Answer: it must come what may increase case study solution size of case study answer sweet spot, in order that case study answer centre of percussion is higher up case study solution bat while still enabling case study solution ball to be hit lower down case study answer blade where case study solution batspeed relative to case study answer ball is greater. You’re surely knowledgeable, are you able to fill in that “come what may” of mine?I am studying case study solution history of case study answer famous London firm Merryweather and Sons Ltd, best known for fire fighting equipment. In Victorian times they made “machinery for making cricket bats” book A Record of Two Centuries, 1901.